100 research blogposts since 2018
100 research blogposts: Why and how I write this sustainabilty investment research blog and how I apply the evidence to investments
Stewardship etc.: Researchpost 100
>20x new research on inequality, biodiversity, ESG incidents, carbon credits and indexing, greenium, stewardship, gender, social taxonomy, withdrawals and art investing by authors such as Florian Berg, Laurens Swinkels and many more
Investors drive ESG: Researchpost 99
Investors drive ESG: >10x new research on climate spillovers, plastic, supply chains, bribes, gender, credit, ESG, behavioral finance, hedge funds, art investments and Bitcoin
Konzentration und SDG-Fokus gut: Meine 9 Monats Performance 2022
Konzentration und SDG: In den ersten 9 Monaten 2022 haben meine Portfolios zwar absolut schlecht, aber in vielen Fällen relativ gut performt.
ESG End? Researchpost 98
ESG End? >10x new research on tourism, waste, health, emerging markets, ESG ratings, impact investments, investment frameworks, buyouts and venture capital by Alex Edmans, Timo Busch, Uwe Walz and others
Passive positive: Researchpost 96
>10x new research on Youngsters, scope 3, ESG leaders, welfare, ratings, index investing, fractional trading, NFT and more
Green pills: Researchpost 95
Green pills: >10 new research studies on CEO pay, climate scenarios and reporting, green and black bonds, big asset managers, green pills and responsible investing barriers, fund ratings, tail risks, hedge funds and fintech
Responsible investing limits: Researchpost 94
Responsible investing limits: >10x new research on negative emissions, biodiversity offsets, inequality, social capital, green cost of equity, CSR, article 9, engagement, dividends, VCs, crypto
ESG plus SDG-Alignment mit guter Performance: FutureVest ESG SDG
Mein FutureVest ESG SDG Aktienfonds (vgl. www.futurevest.fund), für den ich (fast) nur strenge Nachhaltigkeitskriterien nutze, hat mit -0,3% seit Jahresanfang vergleichsweise gut performt. Er ist im aktuellen Jahr etwa ein Prozentpunkt besser als eine traditionelle passive Benchmark und vier Prozentpunkte besser als vergleichbare aktiv gemanagte Fonds